Instapundit » Blog Archive » GUNWALKER AND THE FOUNDATION OF LIBERTY. It all comes down to this: Is there an inalienable right…: GUNWALKER AND THE FOUNDATION OF LIBERTY.It all comes down to this: Is there an inalienable right to self-defense? If there is, each man has indisputable, inestimable value, value that he may rightly preserve even if the life of another man is forfeit. A man may kill another in lawful self-defense even if the policy preferences of the state would prefer his death. If a right to self-defense actually exists, it is in a very real sense the highest law of the land and all lesser laws must pay it deference. It fundamentally defines the social contract, the nature of the relationship between man and the state.
But if there is no such inalienable right, the entire nature of the social contract is changed. Each man’s worth is measured solely by his utility to the state, and as such the value of his life rides a roller coaster not unlike the stock market: dependent not only upon the preferences of the party in power but upon the whims of its political leaders and the permanent bureaucratic class. The proof of this analysis surrounds us.
I made a similar observation in my Second Amendment Penumbras piece.
Posted by Glenn Reynolds at 10:49 am
There it is. The ultimate liberty litmus test. I believe you'll find that all liberals -- and especially their masters -- will fail it when pressed.
Posts
